ARL among experts reviewing long debated chemical rocket handling, disposal options in KY

By T'Jae Gibson, Army Research Laboratory, Public Affairs OfficeDecember 20, 2012

Blue Grass Chemical Agent-Destruction Pilot Plant Munitions Demilitarization Building
1 / 4 Show Caption + Hide Caption – installation of exterior siding has begun on the Blue Grass Chemical Agent-Destruction Pilot Plant Supercritical Water Oxidation Process Building. This building will house the reactors where agent and energetic hydrolysates will be subjected to very ... (Photo Credit: U.S. Army) VIEW ORIGINAL
M55 Rocket
2 / 4 Show Caption + Hide Caption – A chemical operations crew from the Umatilla Chemical Depot separate rocket motor and warhead sections on nine M55 rockets that were sent to an Army lab in Picatinny, N.J., on June 13 for propellant sampling and analysis. Results from the analysis ar... (Photo Credit: U.S. Army) VIEW ORIGINAL
Blue Grass Chemical Agent-Destruction Pilot Plant Laboratory
3 / 4 Show Caption + Hide Caption – Construction and systemization activities for the Blue Grass Chemical Agent-Destruction Pilot Plant Laboratory are complete. During plant operations, laboratory technicians will verify chemical agent destruction before the hydrolysate from the neutra... (Photo Credit: U.S. Army) VIEW ORIGINAL
Dr. Brad Forch, ARL Fellow
4 / 4 Show Caption + Hide Caption – (Photo Credit: U.S. Army) VIEW ORIGINAL

An expert panel recently recommended to the Defense Department that thermal and chemical technologies may present the best disposal options of the more than 69,000 Cold War-era M55 rockets containing nerve agents currently stored at the Blue Grass Army Depot.

The committee on "Disposal Options for the Rocket Motors from Nerve Agent Rockets Stored at Blue Grass Army Depot" of the Board on Army Science and Technology at the National Research Council completed its nine-month review in October. The panel teamed to offer guidance on technologies and options for the disposal of the rocket motor sections of the M55 rocket.

Dr. Brad Forch, the U.S. Army Research Laboratory senior research scientist for ballistics, said one of the committee's tasks was to look at alternate methods to dispose of separated rocket motors. He was the sole Army representative on the panel.

He said much of the committee's study addressed safety risks that can impact the disposal of the separated rocket motors, which contain approximately 20 pounds degraded M28 propellant that are now more than 50 years old.

The committee also investigated the status and maturity of disposal options for the separated rocket motors that include treatment and disposal on-site at the depot or off-site at a commercial or governmental facility; and the feasibility of recycling options for the propellant and rocket motor components and analysis of relevant safety, health, environmental and regulatory requirements.

The use of explosive destruction technologies was one recommended option. These technologies were recently integrated in demilitarization efforts at Sandia National Laboratories and at the Anniston Chemical Agent Disposal Facility. Recent studies showed that communities near those operations recognized that the safe use of explosive destruction technologies can meet state regulations, and can reduce the risk to workers and the community.

The M55 rocket is almost seven feet long, and has a warhead that contains approximately 10 pounds of chemical nerve agent. The M55 rockets will be destroyed at the Blue Grass Chemical Agent-Destruction Pilot Plant, whose construction is expected to be completed by 2017. The plant will robotically cut the rocket and separate it into the rocket warhead and the rocket motor. Plans are to destroy the rocket warhead at that facility by chemical neutralization followed by supercritical water oxidation.

"The plant is loaded with all sorts of sensors and safety equipment to destroy the chemical agents completely. Decades of research and study went into developing the process," Forch said about the Program Executive Office for Assembled Chemical Weapons Alternatives effort.

But the safety risks associated with disposing separated rocket motors are some of the biggest obstacles the Army faces, he said. Due to aging and degradation, the M28 propellant has potentially become more sensitive to shock and thermal conditions.

According to the 2012 report, "The separated rocket motors will also be more exposed to environmental conditions, such as heat and humidity, than they were as part of an assembled rocket. This could accelerate propellant degradation and increase the safety risks. Measures can be taken, however, to address the risk of accelerated propellant degradation, among them using desiccant to control humidity, and designing storage boxes so that heat dissipation is adequate. In any case, the committee believes that the separated rocket motors should be disposed of as soon as possible after rocket cutting."

Forch added that because of its solid state, opposed to the liquid found in the chemical warhead section, the rocket motor is harder to destroy.

Since the mid-1960s, the United States produced more than 400,000 M55 chemical rockets for military use, according to a U.S. Army Chemical Materials Agency fact sheet. But none of the rockets were ever used in combat so by 1981, they were declared obsolete and of no military value.

Rockets have been stockpiled within Blue Grass' enormous safe storage igloos, but when an increasing number of rocket motors are separated from their warheads during chemical destruction operations, the depot could potentially reach a point where they run out of storage, Forch said.

Forch joined ARL's predecessor organization, the Ballistic Research Laboratory, in 1985 as a National Research Council postdoctoral fellow after completing his terminal degree in physical chemistry/chemical physics. He performed research in laser spectroscopy in the areas of ignition and combustion research at BRL, and was subsequently hired as a civilian employee in 1986. He spent his nearly 30-year career working with energetic materials and ballistics, which includes concentrations in gun propellants, rocket propellants and explosives. He was named an Army Senior Research Scientist for Ballistics in 2009, and an ARL Fellow in 2010.

ARL's Dr. Rose Pesce-Rodriguez and Dr. Stephanie Piraino Haynes, both experts in solid propellant ingredient chemical and physical properties research, also contributed to this project.

Related Links:

Army Research Laboratory