The U.S. Army has launched the Strategic Capital Initiatives (SCI), a landmark effort to partner with the private sector to accelerate a historic, enterprise-wide modernization. This initiative marks a fundamental shift away from traditional government contracting and toward a more agile, collaborative model. We are inviting industry leaders, investors, and innovators to co-invest with us, harnessing the speed and ingenuity of the commercial market to build the resilient Army required to secure our nation's future.
The Army recently issued a Request for Information (RFI) on SAM.gov, seeking industry ideas on the best structure for these new partnerships. Here's a one-pager outlining the RFI effort.
To meet the challenges of the 21st century, the Army must move at the speed of innovation. The Strategic Capital Initiative operationalizes the National Defense Strategy by creating a new framework for public-private partnership. Our goal is to supplement traditional funding with strategic capital, creating commercially viable and self-sustaining ventures that strengthen our industrial base, enhance our readiness, and provide a significant return on investment for our partners and the American taxpayer.
This is a two-way street. The Army brings unique assets to the table that are difficult for the private sector to acquire, including thousands of acres of secure, underutilized land, a stable and predictable demand signal for critical capabilities, and a mission of national importance. In return, we are seeking your boldest ideas and the capital to turn them into reality. We are open to a wide range of structures—from long-term leases to joint ventures—and are committed to creating partnerships where your success is aligned with our mission.
We are seeking innovative solutions across the full spectrum of Army operations. Our initiative is focused on six strategic pillars that represent concrete opportunities for investment and growth:
We are casting a wide net to build a new ecosystem of partners. Whether you are a venture capital firm looking to scale a new technology, an institutional investor seeking stable, long-term returns in infrastructure, an industrial leader capable of re-shoring supply chains, or an innovative small business with a transformative idea, we want to hear from you.
This begins with a conversation. We have released a formal Request for Information (RFI) as a broad call for your ideas. This is your opportunity to help us shape the future of this initiative and design the financial and partnership models that will drive success.
[RFI] View the Request for Information (RFI)
[EMAIL] Contact Our Team
The RFI, along with its attachments, can be found here.
“RFI Response: Private Capital and Market Participant Investments” is the correct way. However we will take all RFI answers.
We intend to follow-up on the most promising RFI responses with a targeted Commercial Solutions Opening (CSO). While we are obligated to hold a competitive bidding process, it would be based on the terms you help define. Our process is designed to turn innovative concepts into actionable acquisition strategies in the next 6-12 months.
Yes. David R. Fitzgerald, Deputy Undersecretary of the Army, hosts a weekly Live Open Range Q&A Session, on Thursdays from 2 to 4 p.m. EST, via Microsoft Teams. You can request the meeting invitation and login details by emailing usarmy.pentagon.mbx.strategic-capital-initiative@army.mil.
All proposals incorporating specific Pillars will be reviewed and considered. The proposals that integrate multiple streams that support multiple pillars in integrated way will be the most competitive.
A hybrid approach would likely be most effective. You should present a broader, enterprise-level solution that outlines your company's strategic vision and capabilities, while using specific, individual locations as concrete examples or case studies of how that vision could be implemented.
The Army is seeking tangible Industry groups that are able to self-organize and provide an array of funding and underwriting options as part of their proposal. These will be the more competitive proposals.
Respondents should ideally present a team of stakeholders which they would like to partner with alongside the Army. The best responses will have all of the above stakeholders identified.
Absolutely. A compelling response is the catalyst for action. While we must ensure competition, we do so by building a solicitation around the best idea. The author of that idea inherently holds a commanding advantage. You will have defined the terms of the debate, and your proposal will be the standard against which all others are measured.
We fully expect a Commercial Solutions Opening or Request for Proposal stemming from these RFI responses. Expect a quick turnaround for those proposals that are deemed sufficient within 1-2 months for a solicitation posting on sam.gov.
Based on the goals and language within the RFI, the partnership models that align best are those that emphasize flexibility, commercial viability, and the creation of dual-use assets. The Army is signaling a move away from traditional, rigid government contracts and towards more agile, commercially-driven partnerships.
The Strategic Capital Initiatives is leveraging pre-existing authorities granted by Title 10 USC 2667, specifically for Enhanced Use Leases and Public Private Partnerships.
The Army is willing to be customer, co-investor, landlord, or any combination of the above. You should think of the Army's role as that of a strategic enabler and vested partner.
The Army will consider a wide range of proposals of equity consideration through either profit sharing, production off take, and equity stake as proposed and agreed upon conditions during negotiations.
Venture funds are eligible to participate, but their proposal must describe a tangible business case for how their good or service can integrate into the requirements stated in the RFI.
The Army is open to the idea of a fund, but with specific stipulations: 1) The Army will not enter into exclusive contracts which might lead to vendor lock-in or limit decision space in the future 2) the Army must retain some veto authority over the investments of the fund to ensure it remains aligned with Army needs.
The Army is seeking innovative IP frameworks that move beyond standard DFARS structures. We recognize that for our commercial partners' proprietary IP is foundational to their enterprise value, and we are committed to negotiating agreements that protect that value. In parallel, any agreement must provide the Army with pre-defined, limited 'step-in rights' to ensure mission continuity.
The Army views in-kind consideration as potentially more valuable than cash rent, provided it directly supports mission readiness, modernization, and installation resilience. The fundamental preference is for value that the Army would otherwise have to procure itself.
As of now, there is no intent to create an Army sourcing team, but it may be within scope in follow-on iterations.
Company X, which is owned by Private Equity Firm Y, has a fantastic patent on a new, advanced lithium-ion battery that represents a significant leap forward in technology compared to previous versions. The U.S. Army uses lithium batteries in several of its systems – from handheld radios to drones. There is also a sizeable commercial market for lithium batteries, which are used in cell phones and other electronics. Private Equity Firm Y therefore proposes the following:
The responses will be evaluated holistically. Factors like financial model viability, speed to execution, dual-use scalability, measurable readiness outcomes, are all important. Overall, the Army seeks the best opportunities to generate benefits for the Army, while also supporting its ongoing commitment to take care of its Soldiers, prepare to fight and win the Nation’s wars, and be a part of its surrounding communities. The selection of one proposal will not automatically exclude another proposal. Additionally, the Army expects to conduct numerous rounds after the initial solicitation period. We will provide general feedback on submissions to help you rework them for future rounds.
There are numerous arrangement options that are potentially feasible such as service agreement, off-take commitment, pay-for-performance milestones, enterprise software subscription. Ultimately, this outreach to industry has had to strike a fine balance between seeking creative solutions and being overly prescriptive. The Army’s role as the anchor customer will largely depend on the activity that is being proposed. If it is for the manufacturing of dual-use capabilities that the Army has an organic demand for, the Army’s role will likely be an off-take partner. Proposals that can provide a clearly defined benefit that leverages the Army’s long-term stability as a partner will be weighted highly.
The most competitive proposals would be the ones that can create multiple streams of benefit. If Army installations were treated as an ecosystem, a proposal would tie together mutually beneficial activities and entities. For example, activities and projects that would attract additional commercial entities, academic research activities, logistics networks, and other government entities around Army installations would be highly competitive.
The eligibility requirements explicitly state that a proposing entity must have majority domestic ownership and control and be organized under U.S. law. The Army will not review proposals made by foreign persons or organizations. The framework is designed to enforce this domestic ownership requirement, not to create exceptions for allied capital.
The Army is willing to use press releases, letters of intent, and any other non-binding measures as a means of communicating a bankable demand signal.
All submissions will be handled and considered as Contract Sensitive. Therefore, proprietary commercial information included as part of the submission will be protected under Exemption 4, which precludes Trade Secrets from FOIA requests.
The Army needs everything from modernized railhead facilities to barracks, to dining facilities. If companies are interested in touring a particular installation, we can help arrange the tour.
Any proposals that demonstrate value to the Army and the achievement of its stated objectives will be evaluated regardless of the governance structure internal to the primary industry partner, provided that the commitments are met as agreed upon.
The Army’s preferred mechanism involves the use of existing authorities under Title 10 USC 2667 for Enhanced Use Leases or Public-Private Partnerships.
The capacity is 2.8 MW.
Below are three examples:
Appendix E to the Army base RFI on Sam.gov provides a list of all the developable land in the Army’s real estate portfolio. The Army is open to all proposals for enhanced use leases or public-private partnership opportunities for the installations listed.
Currently, anticipated responses to the RFI are limited to basic components and parts of commercially available dual-use technologies such as UAS.
The Army’s most critical mineral needs include Antimony, Arsenic, Bismuth, Gallium, Germanium, Indium, Natural Graphite, Rare Earth Elements, Scandium, Tantalum, Tungsten, and Yttrium.
The Capability Program Executive for Ammunition and Energetics also periodically publishes a list of 30 high-priority chemical materials deemed critical to the U.S. Army. Ultimately, the Army is interested in any and all opportunities for onshore production of these materials.
The Capability Program Executive for Ammunition and Energetics periodically publishes a list of 30 high-priority chemical materials. The Army is interested in any and all opportunities to on-shore production of these materials.
The road map is built around six "Characteristics of Need": 1) Energy, Supply and Services; 2) Advanced Manufacturing and Maintenance; 3) Assured Distribution; 4) Ammunition and Energetics; 5) Predictive Sustainment; and 6) Medical. Each has specific investment opportunities, from mobile microgrids to autonomous resupply and tele-maintenance.
The following are examples of our six characteristics of need(s):
Energy, Supply, and Services: This concept focuses on reducing fuel demand by developing mobile capabilities for power production, storage, and distribution.
Advanced Manufacturing and Maintenance: This concept aims to bring critical manufacturing and repair capabilities to the point of need, increasing readiness and reducing reliance on depots.
Assured Distribution: This concept is about fielding a resilient, multi-domain network of distribution platforms to supply dispersed forces.
Ammunition and Energetics: This concept seeks to modernize the ammunition industrial base through targeted risk assessments and private partnerships.
Predictive Sustainment Annex: This area uses data and AI to forecast logistics needs and create a "precision sustainment" model integrated with command and control.
Medical Annex: This concept integrates advanced medical capabilities into the logistics framework to improve casualty care at the point of injury.
The Capability Program Executive for Ammunition and Energetics periodically publishes a list of 30 high-priority chemical materials identified as critical for the U.S. Army. Below is the current list. Ultimately, the Army is interested in any and all opportunities for on-shore production of these materials.
* Smoke Solvent, Nitroanthraquinone, Quinaldine, Sublimed Quinizarin, Tech Quinizarin, Lueco Quinizarin