Task Force 120 - Network Capability Sets
SENIOR LEADERS ARE SAYING
"…the key to achieving enhanced capability at this point is not by adding additional systems or programs. Instead, what’s needed is a network capable of connecting the separate systems together."
- Vice Chief of Staff of the U.S. Army, General Peter Chiarelli at the Institute for Defense and Government Advancement, First Annual Command and Control Summit
25 June 2009, Georgetown University Conference Center, Washington, D.C
WHAT THEY'RE SAYING
Year of the Noncommissioned Officer
"Going from a Bradley section leader at 3rd Brigade (Combat Team, 4th Infantry Division) to potentially responding to a nuclear attack in a command and control unit is a challenging transition. I have been serving in the Army for 10 years and have never been a part of anything like this - but that is what we, as NCOs, are supposed to do: train and adapt to the mission, no matter how much it differs from anything we have ever done."
- Staff Sgt. Darin Ingle, an operations NCO with Army North, commenting on moving from a combat mission mindset to Defense Support to Civil Authorities mindset
U.S. Army North NCOs adapt to new challenges during Vibrant Response 2009
INFORMATION YOU CAN USE
- Early Bird News Site
- Information Papers with "2009 Army Posture Statement"
- Stories of Valor
- Army Public Affairs Portal
- Strategic Communication Coordination Group (SCCG) Workspace
- 2009 Strategic Communication Guide - Read the 2009 Army Strategic Communication Guide for key messages and updates
A CULTURE OF ENGAGEMENT
Task Force 120 - Network Capability Sets
What is it?
A capability set includes interoperable communication systems and applications fielded together to strengthen Brigade Combat Team (BCT) Battle Command Network and improve effectiveness in today's operational environment. New capability sets will continue to build upon the current network every two years, upgrading units' communication capabilities to provide capabilities most in demand. Capability set fielding will be synchronized with the Army force generation model, and will include the necessary doctrine, organization, training, and leader development required to train, maintain, and fight as a fully integrated BCTs.
What has the Army done?
The Army is transitioning to a brigade modernization approach that biannually develops and fields capability packages to adapt to the changing operational environment - filling the highest priority shortfalls for Soldiers and their leaders with the best capabilities available. Each package will include a capability set focused on the Battle Command Network and will strengthen ties to critical resources, information, and fellow Soldiers - ultimately empowering individual Soldiers and BCT leaders.
What is planned for the future?
The Army is considering several systems to satisfy requirements for a robust network and battle command on the move. Systems under consideration include the Warfighter Information Network-Tactical (WIN-T) INC 2, Joint Tactical Radio System Ground Mobile Radio (JTRS GMR), and Enhanced Position Location Radio System (EPLRS). The Army is also enhancing current applications and fielding the tactical ground reporting (TIGR) application to allow units at company level and below to share/display relevant information.
Why is it important to the Army?
The significance of the battle command network continues to grow. Capability sets allow the Army to incrementally field fully integrated command and control tools, which supports command needs, while maintaining backward and forward compatibility with other units in the force. Ultimately, these sets provide a means for the Army to keep up with the rapid pace of change in the operating environment.
ABOUT THE ARMY
- Mental stress training is planned for U.S. Soldiers (NYT)
- Army readies draft of modernization plan (GE)
- Two days of hell, nine men of valor (ARMY)
- Residents sound off on plans to build National Guard, Army Reserve training center in Gloucester County (NJ)
- MMA fighter wins battle to stay in Army (AT)
- Obama defends strategy in Afghanistan (NYT)
- Odierno proposes three-part security force for Northern Iraq (ARMY)
- Iraq may hold vote on U.S. withdrawal (WP)
- NATO to keep guns quiet on Afghan election day (USA)
- U.S. intelligence and Afghan narcotics (WP)
- Taliban say bombs 'a gift' to U.S. envoy (BG)
- Notes from the Front Lines: Who are the Taliban? (NYT)
- Iran ready for nuke talks without preconditions (AA)
- S. Korea, U.S. begin war game amid N. Korean threat (KH)
- Kabul hit ahead of Afghan poll (AJ)
- British forces to remain in Afghanistan for another five years, says Richard Dannatt (LDT)
- Pakistan Taliban spokesman 'held' (BBC)
- Donkeys take ballots to Afghan voters (TT)
- STAND-TO! Home
- Subscribe/Unsubscribe to STAND-TO!
- Send Feedback
- Privacy & Security
- U.S. Army Homepage
External Links Disclaimer - The appearance of hyperlinks to external sites does not constitute endorsement by the Department of the U.S. Army of the linked web site or the information, products or services contained therein. For other than authorized activities such as military exchanges and Morale, Welfare and Recreation sites, the Department of the U.S. Army does not exercise any editorial control over the information you may find at these locations. Such links are provided consistent with the stated purpose of this DoD web site.